It has been, roughly 3 years since that day I made a decision to give it all up. To give up everything that is not attached to self. To be self, without anything else.
But,
In there was the fallacy. The illusion probably, that if a mind can free of everything else material, it is truly free.
It is not.
It is not the mind that should be freed of everything else, but it should be free of itself.
Huh?
Let me explain, through analogy and reference. It is easy for a person to say they are not materialistic (I hope by saying this, the argument is NOT centred around 'materialism'). It is easy to give up your job, it is easy not be seduced by money, it is easy not to be driven my emotion.
What is not easy, is to be free of what you define as being who you are. I think (herewith is my realisation) the driving force behind everything one does is that definition of self, that thing you refer to when you start saying: I; I am; I can; I will; I dream; I want; I wish; etc.
What is, I?
So, whilst walking back home today, I had a thought, that even though I have given up everything I had: money, car, house (well, an apartment), job, love (yep love, [insert deity of choice] knows I have, not once, but thrice), I have not truly given up the one thing that is the source of my discontent.
That thing, that denies me of the experience of this life, denies me of a chance to hear and understand another opinion, that thing that 'gets in the way' of things that need to be done, or should be done.
That thing, is I.
I, think I should not be I. (I'm am trying to keep this short, so bare with me)
I think, I have been myself for way too long, I think it's time I try something (or someone :-) else. Hell, if there is only take at this life, I might as well enjoy it, by being as many things as I can.
Well, at the same time, this is also inline with my current Buddhist training, so, we will see where it all ends.
